Trump & Elon Again?

May 01, 2026 

Trump & Elon Again? 

Featured: NVDA – The Options Market Feels a Little Too Comfortable. 

Editor’s Note: The tech expert behind 28 triple-digit winners just uncovered a story involving Elon Musk and the White House that could be bigger than Tesla, SpaceX and xAI combined. Learn more before the “mother of all IPOs.” 

Dear Reader, 

Washington is about to send shockwaves through the stock market once again… 

Not one but two Executive Orders are forcing the Treasury, the IRS, the Department of Homeland Security, and five other federal agencies to prepare America’s entire financial system for a radical new era.

And the man at the center of this new era is, once again, Elon Musk. 

This isn’t speculation… a massive rollout has just begun across 50 states. 

And what happens next involves more money than SpaceX, Tesla and xAI – COMBINED. 

My name is Luke Lango. I was ranked the #1 stock picker in America in 2020. My readers have had the chance to see gains as high as AMD +13,500%… Nvidia +5,000%… Palantir +1,200%. 

But I’ve never seen a setup like this one. 

When the President of the United States personally clears the path for the world’s richest man’s biggest project to date… investors should pay attention. 

I’ve put together all the details on this story, and #1 place to put your money, here.

Best, 

Luke Lango
Senior Investment Analyst, InvestorPlace 

P.S. The last time I spotted an opportunity like this, my followers had the chance to make as much as 31,000% over a decade. This time, with the White House already onside, I think the opportunity could be even bigger. Learn more here.

FEATURED ARTICLE

NVDA: The Options Market Feels a Little Too Comfortable.

$NVDA ( ▼ 0.44% )   

May 20 is the date. After the close. 

And what’s funny (not funny) is how calm the options market can look when everyone knowsit’s a live wire. Nvidia earnings tends to do that thing where the narrative is “historic numbers” and the stock response is… fine. Slightly disappointing. Then everyone who paid up for premium spends the next morning staring at IV crush like it’s a personal insult. 

As I’m writing this, NVDA is hanging around the $200 area, about 8% off the 52-week high (~$216.83). Big cap, big expectations, still not “cheap” on trailing metrics (around 40.7x), but also not priced like a dying hardware company. So the setup isn’t about valuation. It’s about reaction. 

Here’s the thing: the market is pretty good at pricing the number. It’s worse at pricing the mood. 

Quick rewind. The last fiscal Q4 (reported late February) was ridiculous in the literal sense: $68.1B revenue (up 20% sequentially, 73% YoY). Full fiscal year revenue was $215.9B (up 65%), and non-GAAP EPS for the year was $4.77. That’s not “beat and raise.” That’s a different category. 

Then management guided for roughly 77% revenue growth in the current quarter. Consensus is sitting around ~79%, which is basically Wall Street saying: “Cool, but do the thing you always do and beat the guide anyway.” That’s the bar now. It’s a moving bar, and it’s higher than most people admit out loud. 

Also: hyperscalers were just over 50% of data center revenue last quarter. The combined capex track for Alphabet/Amazon/Meta/Microsoft has been floating around $700B for the year. That’s the demand pool. NVDA is still the cleanest expression of it, whether we like how crowded the trade is or not. 

The part people skip: implied vs what actually happens

NVDA’s average 1-day realized move around earnings over the last five reports is about 6.32%. 

And the last four one-day reactions: -5.46%, -3.15%, -0.79%, +3.25%. So if you’ve been buying the “it’s NVDA, it has to swing” story, the tape has been quietly taking money from you. Over and over. Not because the company is weak—because expectations are already inhaled. 

Slight tangent, but it matters: remember the February 2025 “DeepSeek kills GPU demand” panic? That was the last time I saw people truly lean into a bearish narrative that felt sticky. The stock dropped hard post-earnings that cycle (about -8.48%). And then… inference needs kept growing. The “demand goes away” trade has had a rough life since. 

So going into May 20, the question isn’t “Will they beat?” The question is “How much do you have to beat by to get paid for owning volatility?” Because if IV is elevated into the event (and it usually is), you’re not just betting on direction. You’re betting on a reaction that clears the premium. That’s harder than it sounds. 

Where I’m at on structures (not a “checklist”, just how I’m framing it)

If you’re bullish but don’t love paying full freight into an IV spike, I keep coming back to a defined-risk call spread in the first full week after earnings (the May 28 expiration). Something like the $210/$230 call spread is at least the right shape: you’re expressing upside while limiting how much IV drag can ruin your day. 

If you think we get the same movie again (strong print, “good but not good enough” reaction), then a defined-risk premium sell is the cleaner expression. Short straddle logic, but with guardrails: an iron condor centered near spot with wings beyond roughly that ~6–7% realized neighborhood. You’re basically saying: “I don’t need to be a hero, I just need implied to be too expensive.” 

What matters is… the bear risk isn’t just “macro” or “valuation.” It’s guidance language. Supply. Constraints. Any hint that the bottlenecks migrate from gaming into data center commentary, or any tone shift that makes the next-quarter bar feel even slightly less automatic, and the reaction can get sharp fast. That’s the part I’m not casual about. 

  • Date check: May 20 after the close (binary event, no ambiguity) 
  • The day-before habit: price the straddle the morning of May 19 and translate it into % of spot 
  • IV reality check: if IV percentile is up in the 70s+, I start leaning “sell structures” unless I have a very specific directional view 
  • Watchlist between now and then:hyperscaler capex chatter + any sudden “spend digestion” talk (that’s usually where the air pocket starts) 

And yeah, this is the annoying part: the market can be right about the move and still make most people wrong about the trade. 

If you want, I can map the exact implied move math (and what wings would look like around it) once we see where spot and the front-week IV settle—because that’s when it stops being theory and turns into a trade you can actually live with. 

May 20 is close enough that the pricing will start to get honest. Or at least… honest-ish. We’ll see. 

This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Investing involves risk.

The Cheap Investor is a publication of Investing Media Solutions, LLC.

To view our full policies: Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions

Update your email preferences or unsubscribe here

© 2026 The Cheap Investor 

203 N La Salle Suite 2100
Chicago , Illinois 60601, United StatesPowered by beehiivTerms of Service 

Unknown's avatar

Published by RJ Hamster

I was born on 6 August 1956 in San Francisco, California to Janet and (the late) Richard Hovis. I grew up in Santa Monica, California where I attended elementary, junior high school, and high school (graduating in 1974), in addition to involvement in sports and recreation (Little League +, the Boy’s Club ++). Further, it was in elementary school – St. Augustine’s By-the -Sea Parish School that I found, and made the choice to truly journey with God. I attended Arizona State University from 1974 to 1977 – seeking to become an architect, however, I was not accepted, and, as such, I graduated with a Liberal Arts degree. Upon graduation from Arizona State University, I attended Cal Poly San Luis Obispo and studied City and Regional Planning at the Master’s level. I successfully completed one (1) year in a two (2) year program – I did not complete the Master’s degree in City and Regional Planning – due to personal reasons. I returned to Santa Monica where I started (October 1979) my career as graphic designer with Exxon Company, USA. I spent five years with Exxon Company, USA. While working with Exxon Company, USA I was accepted into architectural school – Sci-Arc in Southern California, however, I did not attend preferring to stay with Exxon.. In 1982 I married Laura Flosi and in April 1983 we had our one and only child – Lauren Alain Hovis – a gift from God. We moved to Phoenix, Arizona in 1984 from Los Angeles, where I went to work as a graphic designer with Kitchell CEM (from 1985 -1987). From 1987 – 1995 I was an independent contractor, and a registered representative in mortgage finance, financial management, graphic design, and drafting. Further, I attended the University of Phoenix and successfully obtained a Master’s in Business Administration (MBA) in 1982. I was also a member of the Scottsdale Jaycees, where I became very involved in community events and projects. In 1994, I accepted a cartography position with the Defense Mapping Agency in Reston, Virginia. As such, I relocated from Phoenix to Reston. In 1998, I was accepted and worked as a Visual Information Officer with the Central Intelligence Agency. In 2002, I worked as a Support Officer until my retirement (due to a need for shoulder surgery) in September 2018. Away from my Federal Government service, I have been involved in various organizations and activities in Northern Virginia. In November of 2011, I married Rebecca Ouellette in Santa Monica, California. I reside in San Tan Valley, AZ with my two hamster - Jess and Timothy, our fish, our lizard - RJ Lizard., and our cats - Pearl and Grey. As to hobbies, I enjoy playing sports, attending sporting events, mentoring individuals from financial management to hamsters, building models, photography, travel, multimedia design, managing partner for RJ Hamster, and jazz – smooth jazz to a samba or a bossa nova. Love and God Bless, Peter – aka RJ Hamster Jo hi

Leave a Comment